Philosophers are quietly building consensus on adapting to LLM workflows, like they did with SEP
JacksonKernion · x · 2026-09-21
Jackson Kernion observes that academic philosophers are converging among themselves on how to adapt to LLM workflows, much as they once coalesced around shared infrastructure like SEP, PhilPapers, and The Daily Nous / Leiter Reports — though he has no idea how it will play out.
His core intuition: if a reviewer can articulate anything about what they look for in articles, or point to examples they like and why, his experience with agents suggests LLM tools will be exceedingly helpful at extending the will of reviewers.
More from AGI Musings
- Post-singularity optimism: by the 2030s almost everyone will be "rich" — Dr_Singularity · 2026-09-21
- Fact-checking Andrew Yang's claim about self-replicating AI agents — SpiritRealistic8174 · 2026-09-21
- Founder feedback now goes to Claude and GPT, fueling the solo founder boom — brezina · 2026-09-21
- The 'moral singularity' argument: unknowable ASI values rule out 50-50 optimism — danfaggella · 2026-09-21
- ToKTeacher: AI Speeds Error Correction, So We Must Solve Problems Much Faster — burny_tech · 2026-09-21
- Nate So8res breaks 'How would AI kill us?' into three distinct questions — ESYudkowsky · 2026-09-21