Stanford professor co-writes peer reviews with frontier models in 2-3 iterations, plans 15-20 PI network
anshulkundaje · x · 2026-09-21
Stanford professor Anshul Kundaje shares his AI-assisted peer review workflow: after 2-3 iterations with frontier models, he produces more readable reviews he fully vets himself, with AI often catching code-vs-methods mismatches.
He plans to organize 15-20 PIs and ten times as many students and postdocs to run such collaborative reviews regularly, purely out of interest, hoping the movement grows to cover most interesting papers in their sub-fields.
Related event: Stanford Professor to Scale AI-Assisted Peer Review Starting December(5 posts)→
More from AGI Musings
- Agents' bottleneck isn't intelligence but goal commitment — and that's good for alignment — mimi10v3 · 2026-11-12
- Google Cloud survey: 78% say legacy enterprise vendors may not lead the AI era — rseroter · 2026-11-12
- Safety researchers blast OpenAI/Anthropic plan: automating alignment research with possibly misaligned AI — trevposts · 2026-11-12
- NYT essay: resisting Big Tech and AI takes collective action, not willpower — TuhinChakr · 2026-11-12
- Ethan Mollick: 'talk to your documents' RAG solutions already feel dated — emollick · 2026-11-12
- Anthropic's pitch hasn't changed in 5 years: 'AI is winner-take-all, we will build god' — menhguin · 2026-11-12