ICLR's LLM reviewer: 1-2 useful points buried in three pages of nitpicking
Entrepreneur7962 · reddit · 2026-09-21
An author shares first-hand experience with ICLR's LLM Feedback pilot: amid record submissions, the LLM review typically offered only 1-2 genuinely valid points alongside three pages of nitpicking. The poster still considers the initiative worthwhile since it improved the paper somewhat, and asks whether these AI reviews remain publicly visible.
More from Research
- minpts-check: one-run predictor tells if your HDBSCAN clusters survive min_samples changes — leland_mcinnes · 2026-11-12
- Architecture study sparks monitoring concerns over a multi-hop planning spike — ChowdhuryNeil · 2026-11-12
- SGLang Megakernel Pushes Muse Spark to 1,109 tok/s, 2.1x Over Baseline — hsu_byron · 2026-11-12
- ArcGrav: a cross-model Agent Control Language to cut token overhead — ArchitecturalGravity · 2026-11-12
- Open-source dual-arm robot solves tangram puzzles with 90 demos, ~60% success — DanGrover · 2026-11-12
- FutureHouse's deslopper trains Kosmos to write indistinguishably from human experts — proteinrosh · 2026-11-12