ICLR's LLM reviewer: 1-2 useful points buried in three pages of nitpicking
Entrepreneur7962 · reddit · 2026-09-21
An author shares first-hand experience with ICLR's LLM Feedback pilot: amid record submissions, the LLM review typically offered only 1-2 genuinely valid points alongside three pages of nitpicking. The poster still considers the initiative worthwhile since it improved the paper somewhat, and asks whether these AI reviews remain publicly visible.
More from Research
- Founder says frontier lab's Jev copies his 2025 non-autoregressive decision model paper and open weights — abhijithneil · 2026-09-21
- Schmidhuber: LeCun's JEPA is essentially his 1992 Predictability Maximization system — SchmidhuberAI · 2026-09-21
- Score Centering is secretly a STE: new fix targets LLM RL training instability — brandondamos · 2026-09-21
- Most Researchers Still Treat Transformers as Black Boxes, and Public Understanding Is Decades Away — gerardsans · 2026-09-21
- Paper pinpoints EOS token mismatch as the root failure mode of on-policy distillation — tw_killian · 2026-09-21
- AI Haiku Study: GPT-5 and Gemini 2.5 Poems Indistinguishable From Human Work — s_scardapane · 2026-09-21