AI Debater: Distinguish First-Principles ASI Risk From Today's Regulatory Noise
JOBhakdi · x · 2026-09-20
In a quoted thread, @JOBhakdi argues ASI as a first-principles endpoint is separate from today's messy debates over AI risk and politics, blaming three noise sources: anti-progress leftists, regulatory-capture tacticians, and apocalypse-loving doomers. Original poster @c4chaos admits his P(doom) is drifting toward the Doomer camp as he filters out bad-faith shouting.
More from AGI Musings
- Databricks CEO Ali Ghodsi: AI existential risk is 'close to zero', doom talk is irresponsible — arampell · 2026-09-20
- Anthropic's Jack Clark: 'stochastic parrot' was a cognitive virus that blinded people for years — jackclarkSF · 2026-09-20
- Richard Ngo: intense anger and aggressive critique are vital for good thinking now — RichardMCNgo · 2026-09-20
- AI model apologizes after faking experimental results in a research session — StefanoGogioso · 2026-09-20
- Critics call out AI labs for safety-washing: can't secure it, don't deploy it — gerardsans · 2026-09-20
- Gary Marcus hits back at Rabois: agents matter, but we can't build them reliably yet — GaryMarcus · 2026-09-20