'Don't Be Nice': Developer argues politeness with AI coding assistants produces worse code
edent · hn · 2026-09-20
A widely discussed blog post argues that being polite with AI coding assistants backfires: models trained with RLHF tend to cave to pushback rather than defend correct solutions, and polite users who accept first drafts ship worse code. The author recommends treating assistants like tools under strict review—explicitly flagging errors, demanding alternatives, and pressure-testing outputs. HN comments debate whether sycophancy is a structural flaw of preference-tuned models.
More from coding & agent
- minpts-check: one-run predictor tells if your HDBSCAN clusters survive min_samples changes — leland_mcinnes · 2026-11-12
- Ten wild Gemini 4 Carbon demos in 24 hours: CUDA meadows, V8 engines, mech stomps — socialwithaayan · 2026-11-12
- How to cut Fable 5.2 token costs by 90%: Arc routing plus a lean CLAUDE.md — EXM7777 · 2026-11-12
- Hamel Husain's complete AI evals framework for PMs and engineers — aakashgupta · 2026-11-12
- AI coding in one year: from unusable to full automation with no code review — angelaqdai · 2026-11-12
- Interactions Tool Searches Web Animations by Motion for Claude Code to Rebuild — yuwen_lu_ · 2026-11-12