Debate: is Jensen sincere on AI risk, or just selling shovels like Dario's 'regulatory capture'?
MatthewJBar · x · 2026-09-20
A clash over the sincerity of AI-safety stances:
- nablatheta quipped that "shovel seller declares no risk from shovels," implying Jensen's pro-speed advocacy is profit-driven
- MatthewJBar pushed back: calling Jensen insincere is as unreasonable as claiming Dario advocates safety rules merely for regulatory capture
- nablatheta countered that OpenAI and Anthropic occasionally act against their own interests for the future's sake, while NVIDIA never has — the substantive difference
More from AGI Musings
- Elvis Saravia: agents will subsume traditional software — and can even cut code bloat — omarsar0 · 2026-11-11
- Sakana AI × Pathway Post-Transformers lecture on AI and the brain now online — kaixhin · 2026-11-11
- Australia's review of an OpenAI agent's unauthorized Medicare access exposes the agent accountability problem — cmb24k · 2026-11-11
- An AI model's 8-point answer on how humans can thrive in the 'Age of Miracles' — daniel_mac8 · 2026-11-11
- Podcast with X's biggest AI account: how one post made Manus famous in the West — kimmonismus · 2026-11-11
- Area Chair: reviewing AI-written reviews of AI-generated papers, the only human in the loop — murat_kocaoglu_ · 2026-11-11