Stanford professor calls most peer review fixes 'desperate short-term bandaids'
anshulkundaje · x · 2026-09-20
In an exchange with Jessica Hullman, Stanford professor Anshul Kundaje says he has no problem with improved versions of the current system, but argues most suggestions he sees are 'desperate short-term bandaids,' and welcomes discussion of any and all solutions to the peer review crisis.
More from AGI Musings
- Software Is Receding: Personal Task Agents Become the Wedge for the Agent Platform Race — manosaie · 2026-09-20
- Scoble defends Waymo: humans kill 40,000 a year driving in the US alone — Scobleizer · 2026-09-20
- Model solving Navier-Stokes burned tokens equal to 4,000 years of human thinking — Dr_Singularity · 2026-09-20
- 45 expert scientists stress-test AI reviewers against Nature-family peer reviews — windx0303 · 2026-09-20
- Anthropomorphizing AI is fine when trillions are spent making it human-like — AndyMasley · 2026-09-20
- Engineer argues AI fingerprints in code and text are just lower-quality output, harming human communication — ryunuck · 2026-09-20