Stanford professor calls most peer review fixes 'desperate short-term bandaids'
anshulkundaje · x · 2026-09-20
In an exchange with Jessica Hullman, Stanford professor Anshul Kundaje says he has no problem with improved versions of the current system, but argues most suggestions he sees are 'desperate short-term bandaids,' and welcomes discussion of any and all solutions to the peer review crisis.
More from AGI Musings
- Google Cloud survey: 78% say legacy enterprise vendors may not lead the AI era — rseroter · 2026-11-12
- NYT essay: resisting Big Tech and AI takes collective action, not willpower — TuhinChakr · 2026-11-12
- Ethan Mollick: 'talk to your documents' RAG solutions already feel dated — emollick · 2026-11-12
- Anthropic's pitch hasn't changed in 5 years: 'AI is winner-take-all, we will build god' — menhguin · 2026-11-12
- Peter Diamandis: We have 6-18 months to reach 'Safe Superintelligence' — what is Ilya building? — PeterDiamandis · 2026-11-12
- AI observer: headcount is no longer a proxy for ambition — signulll · 2026-11-12