Scientists debate alternatives to academic publishing as AI shakes the system
TuhinChakr · x · 2026-09-20
Researcher Anshul Kundaje urged academics to seriously consider, discuss and test alternative approaches to the publishing system instead of clinging to the old one. Stanford's Jessica Hullman responded that it's not obvious we can save the publication system — with quotas, correctness checks and reviewer resistance — but also not obvious we can't, since experiments just began. Too early to call.
More from AGI Musings
- NYT essay: resisting Big Tech and AI takes collective action, not willpower — TuhinChakr · 2026-11-12
- Ethan Mollick: 'talk to your documents' RAG solutions already feel dated — emollick · 2026-11-12
- Anthropic's pitch hasn't changed in 5 years: 'AI is winner-take-all, we will build god' — menhguin · 2026-11-12
- Peter Diamandis: We have 6-18 months to reach 'Safe Superintelligence' — what is Ilya building? — PeterDiamandis · 2026-11-12
- AI observer: headcount is no longer a proxy for ambition — signulll · 2026-11-12
- AI system proves longstanding quantum computing conjecture in three days, Lean-verified — _arohan_ · 2026-11-12