With 50k+ ICLR submissions, researchers propose hybrid human-LLM peer review orchestration
HamedSHassani · x · 2026-09-20
- With over 50,000 ICLR submissions and a limited reviewer pool, researcher Shayan Kiyani argues peer review needs something between "all-human" and "all-LLM".
- The proposal: orchestrate the review process between humans and AI, preserving the reliability of human judgment while gaining LLM speed and scalability.
- His team has been working on broader weak/strong verification setups and released related material, calling this a timely moment for the discussion.
More from AGI Musings
- User slams SSI's closed access to frontier model as dangerous, hopes it still goes public — iruletheworldmo · 2026-09-20
- Michael Levin: Intelligence doesn't need a brain — patterns themselves may be alive — burny_tech · 2026-09-20
- If early autocomplete-era LLMs could code, do we even need post-training? — menhguin · 2026-09-20
- Pharma exec admits he barely uses AI day to day despite the hype — TheMoonMidas · 2026-09-20
- Jerry Kaplan argues AI existential risk is sci-fi, not science — zetalyrae · 2026-09-20
- The Jev killer isn't another model — it's a 1M-token context window — cocktailpeanut · 2026-09-20