ICLR 2027 tops 60k submissions as NeurIPS rejects co-authored papers over AI-written reviews
PlisSergey · x · 2026-09-20
ICLR 2027 has received 60k+ submissions. NeurIPS now bans LLM-written reviews: if a reviewer's review shows LLM signs, all papers they co-author get rejected as punishment — while human reviewing takes 4 hours per paper including rebuttals. The poster quips that everyone is now solving a constraint-optimization problem to maximize funding probability.
More from Research
- Fields Medalist Villani on OpenAI's Millennium Problem: 'A Cataclysm Like Math Has Never Known' — GregCook2011 · 2026-09-20
- lateinteraction: Papers are just timestamped formats — the real projects live elsewhere — lateinteraction · 2026-09-20
- Two high school students, aided by AI, report progress on a problem studied by Fields medalist June Huh — IgorCarron · 2026-09-20
- GPU Programming Diary: Revisiting the Classic CUDA Matmul Optimization Worklog and MIT's Sparsity Lecture — NandoDF · 2026-09-20
- New paper finds 'anti-grokking': test accuracy collapses back to chance after successful generalization — sytelus · 2026-09-20
- With 50k+ ICLR submissions, researchers propose hybrid human-LLM peer review orchestration — HamedSHassani · 2026-09-20