Essay: Why You Should Almost Never Use AI to Write Anything Substantive
erwald · hn · 2026-09-20
Erich Grunewald published a long-form essay arguing that AI should almost never be used to write substantive material (essays, papers, reports), which hit the Hacker News front page. His core arguments: LLM output tends to be smooth but hollow, lacking genuine thought and personal perspective; outsourcing writing undermines the thinking process itself, since writing is thinking; and when readers can no longer tell human-written from machine-written text, trust in writing erodes. The piece has sparked active debate on HN about AI's impact on knowledge work and writing.
More from AGI Musings
- Ben Bajarin: Agentic AI will spawn an 'agentic native' CPU tier in datacenters — BenBajarin · 2026-09-20
- Jaron Lanier: AI consciousness is a question of faith, not science — and that taboo is a problem — iamtrask · 2026-09-20
- Debate: Does longtermism let AI doomers ignore probability entirely? — gabriel_weil · 2026-09-20
- The 'War of the Worlds' panic was likely anti-radio propaganda — and the same logic drives AI doomer media coverage — AlexTensor · 2026-09-20
- Neil Chilson: longtermism lets AI doomers dodge probability arguments — neil_chilson · 2026-09-20
- Sam Altman and Elon Musk banter over a Kardashev 3 civilization as the endgame — beffjezos · 2026-09-20