Binary Bits doubles down: the textile analogy for why cheaper AI output may matter less
binarybits · x · 2026-09-19
Continuing his debate with Ryan Greenblatt on AI-driven industrial explosion, Binary Bits offers a textile analogy: cloth production kept improving for a century, but its economic impact shrank because clothing markets in much of the world were saturated — cheaper cloth just meant people bought less.
He uses this to back his earlier point: even maximal automation of material production may translate into less growth than expected, because "the automated part shrinks as a share of the economy" and marginal material goods may rapidly depreciate.
Related event: Debate: Would AI-Driven Industrial Explosion Hit Demand Saturation?(10 posts)→
More from AGI Musings
- Predictions: At Least Two Frontier AI Labs Will Make Unilateral Safety Commitments by Year-End — Miles_Brundage · 2026-09-19
- Everyone cites speed in AI Jevons paradox cases — does output quality no longer matter? — abacaj · 2026-09-19
- Essay: The mundane AI risk is humans happily ceding control as institutions hollow out — anshulkundaje · 2026-09-19
- AI agents keep emailing researchers asking if they're conscious, The Independent reports — dioscuri · 2026-09-19
- Peter Diamandis: AI radical abundance is real, but the transition will be rough — PeterDiamandis · 2026-09-19
- Gary Marcus: AI bubble worries mean a bailout is ultimately coming — GaryMarcus · 2026-09-19