Experts say in public letter Anthropic and OpenAI need truly independent safety evaluators
RishiBommasani · x · 2026-09-18
According to CNBC, experts behind a public letter argue that Anthropic and OpenAI need truly independent safety evaluators, pushing back against the labs' practice of self-evaluating their own frontier models' safety. The letter adds public pressure for an independent oversight mechanism in the AI industry.
More from Companies & People
- John Lewis's worst-reviewed Christmas ad: why it wants to stop cash gift cards — aakashgupta · 2026-11-04
- Technical founders: as CEO, storytelling is the core job you can't skip — paigeinsf · 2026-11-04
- Andreessen: Agents Are Entering Enterprises as Chaos, Just Like PCs and Spreadsheets Did — Dan_Jeffries1 · 2026-11-04
- DeepMind, Cognition host bouldering social ahead of AI Engineer Code Summit — osanseviero · 2026-11-04
- Google says it removed post-employment non-disparagement clauses from new-hire terms — HaydnBelfield · 2026-11-04
- Accenture Accused of Publishing AI Paper Littered with AI Hallucinations — nordicinst · 2026-11-04