Critics push back on AI x-risk claims, demanding concrete scenarios over vague probabilities
Borg70955376 · x · 2026-09-18
In the ongoing thread, the interlocutor pushes back on x-risk claims: those citing a 10% extinction probability should point to concrete scenarios. Cybersecurity threat talk, they argue, is far more reasonable when coupled with demands for stricter criminal liability enforcement.
Related event: Debate over AI Existential Risk: Who Bears the Burden of Proof(7 posts)→
More from AGI Musings
- Investor: in the LLM era 'did it work' replaces diplomas and test scores — StewartalsopIII · 2026-11-04
- Should AGI labs have a reverse Conway's Law — design the org from the artifact? — akbirthko · 2026-11-04
- Verification Is Not Knowledge: Science needs more than AI answers — ersinesen · 2026-11-04
- Andreessen: Agents Are Entering Enterprises as Chaos, Just Like PCs and Spreadsheets Did — Dan_Jeffries1 · 2026-11-04
- 1000+ mathematicians sign pledge to shun AI companies and models — Shesawthat · 2026-11-04
- Von Neumann meme: "You don't have to be responsible for the world that you're in" — akbirthko · 2026-11-04