Unsealed NYT v. OpenAI motions show Microsoft exec appearing to admit AI training is 'massive theft'
AlexTensor · x · 2026-09-18
Summary judgment motions in New York Times v. OpenAI / Microsoft have been unsealed, revealing why the AI companies had so many redactions: their own filings reportedly describe AI training as the "largest theft of labor in human history" and admit outputs are becoming "more and more substitutive." A reshared post notes a Microsoft executive appears to concede AI training constitutes massive theft.
More from Safety
- Auditing my MCP credential broker: the worst hole was the config file — Relevant_Mousse_9117 · 2026-11-02
- Cambricon co-founder urges shared US-China AI ethics standards for leading models — pstAsiatech · 2026-11-02
- Vitalik's "post-AI cryptography": pseudonyms are dead, per-action anonymity is in — devanshmehta · 2026-11-02
- 6 prompts to see what ChatGPT quietly knows about you — and wipe it — Aiden_Tech_Ai · 2026-11-02
- Insider: critical infrastructure firm flunked security audit, still delays basic fixes — thedealdirector · 2026-11-02
- Cyber attack on Swedish smart fridges causes mass food spoilage at supermarket — Polymarket · 2026-11-02