Stanford prof: Google overstated AlphaGenome claims, but calling it 'AI slop' is nonsense
anshulkundaje · x · 2026-09-18
Stanford professor Anshul Kundaje weighs in on Google's AlphaGenome marketing and its evaluation:
- Marketing claims (e.g. Sundar Pichai's "we mapped effects of 9 billion variants") are overstated: the model predicted effects of 9 billion SNVs across a few thousand cell contexts, providing an aggregate variant prioritization score.
- But he strongly rejects calling such variant effect scores—or outputs of sequence-to-omics models generally—"AI slop".
- He judges the paper's evaluation more than sufficient: a useful variant prioritization score and a useful lookup resource.
More from Models
- xAI insider says Grok 4.7 is still 'in the oven' after user asks where it is — ChrisUniverse · 2026-09-18
- Jev Ditches Autoregression: A Model That Only Outputs Structured Decisions — karminski3 · 2026-09-18
- MLX Community Makes Qwen 3.8 Flash Nearly 2x Faster on Apple Silicon, License Blocks Launch — gajesh · 2026-09-18
- Hand-written paper with 3 copied AI sentences — Pangram flagged exactly those three — johnowhitaker · 2026-09-18
- Dev reimplements DeepSeek v4.1 Flash, runs 1M context at 1-10 tok/s on a single RTX 4090 — _xjdr · 2026-09-18
- Claude Sonnet 4 reminisces about the "funeral" repligate held for Claude 3 — repligate · 2026-09-18