Agentic apps need different MLOps: caching, model routing and evals for low latency
kmeanskaran · x · 2026-09-18
Drawing on personal production experience, the author explains why MLOps for agentic projects differs fundamentally from classic ML.
Key points:
- The hardest part is cutting latency while keeping accuracy — only achievable through trial and error.
- Clean logging, observability and dedicated dev/UAT environments are mandatory; otherwise you're "praying for next tokens."
- Chunking strategy matters like feature engineering did in classic ML.
- Four latency levers: high-quality data ingestion, caching to avoid repeated tool calls, better agent system design, and model routing to keep small models on simple queries.
- Latency issues mostly come from searching large chunks and repeated multi-tool calls; accuracy work should focus on agent harness and evals.
- CI/CD is easy; the real difficulty is Terraform and environment separation. A follow-up article on running agents in production is promised.
More from coding & agent
- Claude Code 2.1.275 release imminent — ClaudeCodeLog · 2026-09-18
- Legora's take: there is no best model — lawyers write evals and Legora BAR picks the winner — soleio · 2026-09-18
- Research with Agents: reflections and lessons from using AI agents in scientific work — _xiang_chen_ · 2026-09-18
- Addy Osmani: Running Agents in Old Codebases — Brownfield Agentic Engineering — rseroter · 2026-09-18
- Google's Stellar Colosseum: many-agent harness proves new math theorems — IgorCarron · 2026-09-18
- Official MCP extension lets agents discover and load Skills directly from MCP servers — solyarisoftware · 2026-09-18