Debate over AI 'warners': they cautioned about very different things
tilmanbayer · x · 2026-09-17
- Tilman Bayer pushed back on Neil Turkewitz's objection to the feature's choice of safety researchers, noting the named critics warned about very different things.
- For example, Marcus's 2022 warning was about deep learning hitting a wall, not rogue AI risk.
Related event: Feature on AI risk 'ones who saw this coming' sparks debate over who counts(3 posts)→
More from AGI Musings
- New LessWrong Essay 'The Obliqueness Thesis' Reopens The Orthogonality Debate In AI Alignment — jessi_cata · 2026-09-18
- LBC Call-In Segment Shows the Public Thinks About AI Smarter Than Many Experts — ShakeelHashim · 2026-09-18
- EA community member rebuts 'scandal plagued' claims, says Eliezer's fanfic had little influence — AndyMasley · 2026-09-18
- Educators Debate Banning AI Writing vs. Testing Authors' Actual Understanding — Dr_Atoosa · 2026-09-18
- Longtermism critique goes viral: from mosquito nets to 500-million-year math gone absurd — banteg · 2026-09-18
- AI safety debate: do compute bounds limit the orthogonality of goals and intelligence? — Algon_33 · 2026-09-18