Debate over AI 'warners': they cautioned about very different things
tilmanbayer · x · 2026-09-17
- Tilman Bayer pushed back on Neil Turkewitz's objection to the feature's choice of safety researchers, noting the named critics warned about very different things.
- For example, Marcus's 2022 warning was about deep learning hitting a wall, not rogue AI risk.
Related event: Feature on AI risk 'ones who saw this coming' sparks debate over who counts(3 posts)→
More from AGI Musings
- Ex-Adobe Firefly platform lead cites $5b AI-influenced ARR in AI jobs spat — ericelliott_ · 2026-11-02
- AI reply bots are now so good even a dev can't tell humans from bots — xiaohu · 2026-11-02
- Revisiting 'Machine Behavior': the 2019 Nature paper that predicted today's AI science — iyadrahwan · 2026-11-02
- Most Teams Use AI Like 100 Clones of One Employee — Adam Smith Explains Why That Fails — sebkrier · 2026-11-02
- Self-described early agent engineering pioneer says he's interviewed for hundreds of roles — ericelliott_ · 2026-11-02
- World Bank webinar on Nov 3 unpacks AI readiness as Africa growth rises to 4.3% — ChinasaTOkolo · 2026-11-02