Automated authorship scoring hits AUC 0.90 in verifying real manuscript authors
Dr_Atoosa · x · 2026-09-17
An automated scoring system achieved AUC 0.90 predicting whether a participant was the genuine author of a manuscript. User studies found positive experiences, with participants affirming the questions captured meaningful authorship while flagging weak points and refinements needed before real-world deployment.
More from Research
- LeCun: Meta deprioritized exploratory research after Llama 4 disappointed — schwarzjn_ · 2026-09-17
- Thought experiment: a resurrected Galois proves the Riemann Hypothesis but no one can verify it — wellecks · 2026-09-17
- Thought experiment: resurrected Gauss, Euler and Riemann as mathematical tools — who controls access? — wellecks · 2026-09-17
- Philosopher Eric Schwitzgebel shares draft chapter defending AI rights — eschwitz · 2026-09-17
- Do reasoning models have systematicity of thought? New preprint investigates — LakeBrenden · 2026-09-17
- Human Hearing Atlas: 4.29M audiograms show hearing is a continuous 5D space — zakkohane · 2026-09-17