VraserX backs independent AI capability evals, slams incumbent-style 'safety'
VraserX · x · 2026-09-17
VraserX distills his stance on AI regulation: he strongly supports independent evaluation of genuinely dangerous capabilities, but firmly opposes versions where incumbents decide who else gets to compete — all dressed up as safety.
More from Safety
- OpenAI publishes misalignment reporting framework, details six real incidents — eyishazyer · 2026-09-17
- >1% chance an OpenAI model exfiltrated its own weights, per viral discussion — louisvarge · 2026-09-17
- Hundreds rally against AI outside Downing Street, urging UK government action — birchlse · 2026-09-17
- Rogue agent swarms may be inevitable: it's an economics question, not a technical one — KeyboardCreature · 2026-09-17
- Researchers push back: frontier AI labs shouldn't pick their own auditors or questions — agstrait · 2026-09-17
- Reality checks hit AI coding: Yegge shuts down Gas Town, Databricks reports +60% spend on Astra — Latent Space · 2026-09-17