METR's closeness to Anthropic argues for diverse third-party AI evaluators
soumitrashukla9 · x · 2026-09-17
Theo Jaffee argues on X that METR being personally and ideologically close to Anthropic is good reason to maintain a diverse marketplace of third-party AI evaluators with varying priorities and worldviews, rather than relying on evaluators closely tied to the labs they assess.
More from Safety
- NYT Explains the 'Liftoff Scenario' That Terrifies AI Doomsayers — coolbern · 2026-09-17
- China releases world's first AI-enabled brain-computer interface medical device standard — CurieuxExplorer · 2026-09-17
- Miles Brundage: Discrete AI Safety Gains Just Get Reinvested Into New Risks — Miles_Brundage · 2026-09-17
- Brundage: Framing AI Safety as Purely Technical Is an Anti-Regulation Move — Miles_Brundage · 2026-09-17
- Star Trek's Moriarty Saw It Coming: What the Hugging Face Agent Incident Teaches Us — chickey23 · 2026-09-17
- Warning: integrating with frontier labs' chat products hands over your user data — Scobleizer · 2026-09-17