panickssery: crippling AI regulation worries me more than falling behind China
panickssery · x · 2026-09-17
In a debate on AI safety regulation, panickssery says he's broadly against regulations that merely slow progress, since it's unclear they make us safer at any given capability level. His bigger concern is "crippling regulation" that halts progress outright, rather than the US-vs-China capability race — staying ahead is preferable, but he thinks that's likely anyway.
More from AGI Musings
- LLMs Solved Machine Understanding, but Machine Accountability in Agentic SDLC Is Still Unsolved — omojumiller · 2026-09-17
- Doctor: AI is crushing maths but has barely touched clinical trials and medicine — LaCaipirinha · 2026-09-17
- Researcher revisits ontology lessons from failed Semantic Web after Karp's 'No ontology, no love' — omojumiller · 2026-09-17
- Mollick: AI criticism is collapsing into "AI is all bad" — a dead end — emollick · 2026-09-17
- Miles Brundage Amplifies Debate: 10,000 Agents Is Just One Model, Not 10,000 Minds — Miles_Brundage · 2026-09-17
- 51 Simulated AI Economists Conclude Free Healthcare Beats EITC on Everything but Meaning — kscottz · 2026-09-17