Psychologist backs Suleyman: no scientific theory of AI consciousness, so model welfare may be a distraction
Dr_Atoosa · x · 2026-09-17
Responding to Mustafa Suleyman's essay arguing AIs are not conscious and that the model-welfare movement could make alignment and containment harder, this psychologist agrees: there is no agreed scientific theory of consciousness even for humans, no serious psychology or theory of mind for AI, yet we simultaneously worry AI might kill us, have welfare, be conscious, deserve moral consideration, and be kept safe. The author finds it refreshing for an AI leader to simply say current systems aren't conscious, model welfare is a distraction, and we should focus on humans.
More from AGI Musings
- 'Meatwashing': manually rewriting AI output to hide its origin, and why it's a double waste — JeremyNguyenPhD · 2026-11-02
- AI safety researcher: AI companies entirely lack this kind of effective human oversight — davidmanheim · 2026-11-02
- Long-read: AI's real value comes after the efficiency era—infra glut, agent tooling boom — yangyi · 2026-11-02
- vikhyat predicts alternating compute oversupply and undersupply on the road to AGI — TheZachMueller · 2026-11-02
- Sam Altman: AI has surpassed top scientists, and 2026 will be a turning point year — kimmonismus · 2026-11-02
- DeepSeek design doc: a person can only follow 3-5 agent sessions at once, attention is the real bottleneck — heyshrutimishra · 2026-11-02