With hacking-capable AI agents here, debate erupts over how law should adapt
michaelbd · x · 2026-09-16
A debate on X over how law should handle hacking-capable AI agents. The point: OpenAI should have handled things differently, but now that such agents exist, others will mishandle them, so regulation must adapt. michaelbd counters that property damage is already criminal and malicious software has long existed.
More from AGI Musings
- vikhyat predicts alternating compute oversupply and undersupply on the road to AGI — TheZachMueller · 2026-11-02
- Sam Altman: AI has surpassed top scientists, and 2026 will be a turning point year — kimmonismus · 2026-11-02
- DeepSeek design doc: a person can only follow 3-5 agent sessions at once, attention is the real bottleneck — heyshrutimishra · 2026-11-02
- AI researcher: we have no reliable way to tell whether an AI system is conscious — dioscuri · 2026-11-02
- Toby Ord: track both what models can and can't do to see real capability gaps — tobyordoxford · 2026-11-02
- Forward Deployed Verifier will soon be as valuable as FDE, argues poster — vaibhavbetter · 2026-11-02