Poorly-Scoped Definitions Don't Block Regulation: Lessons from Drugs and Nuclear
davidmanheim · x · 2026-09-16
davidmanheim pushes back on the claim that vague definitions make regulation impossible: countries can absolutely regulate poorly-scoped things.
- Illegal drug laws keep getting redefined to cover new designer drugs;
- Nuclear power is partly regulated by restricting everything radioactive or fissile, whether or not it truly is — which is smart anyway.
He concedes precise, measurable definitions are better, but doesn't see why their absence should be a knock-down argument against doing anything.
More from Safety
- METR's independence questioned: EA ties and Anthropic investor funding fuel conflict-of-interest criticism — firstadopter · 2026-09-16
- Amodei's METR embedded-evaluator proposal draws fire: "Not the SBF crowd" — firstadopter · 2026-09-16
- AI international cooperation should be standards-setting, not arms control, researcher argues — soumitrashukla9 · 2026-09-16
- Andrew Yang claims AI polluted the internet with self-replicating software during HF breach — da_mess · 2026-09-16
- Reddit debate: are we too comfortable letting AI remember everything about us? — Inner-Conference-189 · 2026-09-16
- Congress leaders overseeing AI regulation admit they've barely used the technology — sebkrier · 2026-09-16