Define Before You Measure: The Case for Regulating Poorly-Scoped Tech
averyfjames · x · 2026-09-16
A discussion on whether AI can be regulated when its core concepts are hard to define. davidmanheim argues you must define things before measuring them, or terminology disputes render measurements meaningless.
Key points:
- Counterargument: regulating nuclear reactors requires defining fission and measuring fissile material — what if AI lacks that?
- Rebuttal: states routinely regulate poorly-scoped domains — designer drugs keep getting added to illegal drug definitions, and nuclear power is partly regulated by restricting everything radioactive, fissile or not.
- Conclusion: precise, measurable definitions are better, but their absence isn't a knock-down argument against regulating at all.
Related event: Manheim: define before measuring—AGI debate will be moot within two years(7 posts)→
More from AGI Musings
- Databases to distributed systems: every systems skill is merging into AI inference and hardware — Abhishekcur · 2026-11-02
- Limitless analogy: smarter people may gain far more from superintelligence — McDonaghMatthew · 2026-11-02
- Hunting for the most concrete "curing cancer with AI" roadmap of 2025 — iskander · 2026-11-02
- Avoiding AI brain rot: Miles Cranmer's lecture on learning with AI — _ScottCondron · 2026-11-02
- Yacine mocks "autonomous research" hype as Naam argues RSI loop needs 5-10x boost to run away — yacineMTB · 2026-11-02
- Vitalik's "post-AI cryptography": pseudonyms are dead, per-action anonymity is in — devanshmehta · 2026-11-02