a16z's Josh Elman: AI cut build costs to near zero, but product judgment costs the same
xiaohu · x · 2026-09-16
a16z partner Josh Elman argues that while AI coding tools have collapsed the cost of building software, the cost of making the right product calls hasn't dropped at all.
- A PM's real artifact is a story, not a spec: Elman recalls answering "spec" in his LinkedIn interview and writing a 120-page spec for a recruiting product, but years later concluded the true deliverable is a shared, retellable story of who uses the product and how it changes their lives.
- The dev loop flipped: expensive engineering once forced 6–8 cycles a year of upfront spec/costing/scoping/design; with AI it becomes idea → build with AI → play with it → visual/UX & engineering design → ship → learn.
- New risk is speed: teams can now churn out large volumes of mediocre, unwanted features faster than ever.
- He illustrates with his RealPlayer ad-revenue clash and lessons on helping teams ship the right product.
This is a Chinese write-up (xiaohu.ai) of Elman's piece; the latter part is members-only.
Related event: a16z: AI Cuts Build Costs, Not Product Judgment Costs(3 posts)→
More from AGI Musings
- Reading agent-written code: 'corrigibility' has become a matter of faith — daniel_mac8 · 2026-09-16
- OPEN-1B announced: the world's first fully auditable transformer training run — micoolcho · 2026-09-16
- Chalmers warned of recursive self-improvement on TV in 1996 — now it's near — zetalyrae · 2026-09-16
- AI is the new Excel macro: consultants will inherit fleets of inscrutable vibe-coded systems — id-ltd · 2026-09-16
- Taylor Lorenz defends EA's animal welfare stance, mocks its sci-fi doomerism — nptacek · 2026-09-16
- AI slowdown won't last: a DeepSeek-style breakthrough could restart the race within months — paulnovosad · 2026-09-16