VisTW: a Traditional Chinese VLM benchmark for reading Taiwan — and an eval framework that caught a 36-point bug

piske_usagi · reddit · 2026-09-16

Mainstream VLM evals (MMBench, MMMU, POPE) are English or Simplified Chinese only, so models can ace them yet fail on Taiwanese road signs, receipts, health-insurance cards, or local textbook diagrams. VisTW (NTU MiuLab, arXiv 2503.10427, CC BY 4.0) fills the gap with two subsets: VisTW-MCQ, 4,770 Traditional Chinese multiple-choice questions from real exams across 21 subjects (charts, circuit diagrams, sheet music, medical imaging, maps), and VisTW-Dialogue, 141 open-ended questions about everyday Taiwanese scenes scored 0–10 by an LLM judge. On the official leaderboard, gemma-3-12b-it scores 0.4863 MCQ / 3.94 Dialogue; o3 tops at 0.7769 / 6.9878 (leaderboard stale since April 2025). The author's team added VisTW support to the open-source Twinkle Eval framework (v2.10.0) and validated against the official implementation: same model, endpoint, and 253 sampled questions, 81.01% vs 80.56% accuracy. Alignment surfaced a real bug: the official prompt's "答案: $字母" format made models echo the dollar sign, breaking their extractor, which fell back to a loose pattern and plucked letters from reasoning text — one subject scored 36 points low, and the bug suppressed scores across five vision benchmarks while a 21-question smoke set caught nothing. Also: they report unparsedrate instead of the official LLM-based fallback parser, and reasoning VLMs need headroom (19% truncated at maxtokens 2048, costing 19 points; templates ship at 8192).

Original post →

More from Models

Models channel →