Researchers flag AEF-1 gaps: low org diversity, less detail than PCAOB audit standards
yonashav · x · 2026-09-16
AI governance researchers debated the AI Evaluation Framework (AEF): rajiinio called it a good start but criticized the lack of diversity among involved organizations, doubted the standards are materially enforceable, and noted the detail is a subset of what PCAOB or MDSAP require for audit organization qualifications in other industries. yonashav asked which orgs with subject-matter expertise should be added, and suggested mapping the deltas between AEF-1 and PCAOB/MDSAP to see what can be bridged.
More from Safety
- Jensen Huang: AI Safety Is an Engineering Problem, No New Laws Needed — DavidSacks · 2026-09-16
- callcongress.ai: ex-OpenAI/Anthropic researchers urge public to lobby on AI risk — eli_lifland · 2026-09-16
- Can the US and China work together on AI safety? Insiders weigh in — zijing_wu · 2026-09-16
- Civil society as embedded AI evaluators: Data & Society, CDT, ACLU and more — rajiinio · 2026-09-16
- Tech journalist Timothy Lee says robot regulation may become desirable within a few years — binarybits · 2026-09-16
- AI as Normal Technology team responds: not adversarial to the AI safety community — sayashk · 2026-09-16