AI audit framework AEF-1 criticized as unenforceable and weaker than PCAOB/MDSAP standards
rajiinio · x · 2026-09-16
- Responding to a question about AEF-1, researcher Deborah Raji criticizes the AI "audit conduct standards" framework on two fronts: insufficient diversity among the participating organizations, and standards that are not materially enforceable.
- She argues its details amount to a subset of what audit organizations in other industries must meet under regimes like PCAOB or MDSAP.
- Context: the thread argues that nearly every other industry certifies auditors on technical competence and conflict-of-interest disclosure, and AI is now debating an analogous framework.
Related event: DeepMind researcher Raji criticizes draft AI auditing standard AEF-1(6 posts)→
More from Safety
- ControlAI briefed ~200 US congressional offices and drafted UK 'kill switch' bill — DrTechlash · 2026-09-16
- Sam Altman says AI companies can develop the tech safely without significant harm — i_dg23 · 2026-09-16
- Trump AI Advisor David Sacks: OpenAI and Anthropic should shut down if products can't be safe — DavidSacks · 2026-09-16
- Security researcher publishes sharp critique of Dario Amodei's essay — GoMeansGo · 2026-09-16
- Geodesic Research pitches alignment pretraining that survives capabilities RL — tomekkorbak · 2026-09-16
- AI auditors don't see themselves as substitutes for regulation, want firm rules — Miles_Brundage · 2026-09-16