AI Audit Space Is Chaos: Researcher Calls for Formal Auditor Qualification Standards
rajiinio · x · 2026-09-16
rajiinio argues the AI audit space is chronically chaotic because "auditor" is a self-appointed label anyone can claim. She says qualification shouldn't be decided by public opinion or the audit target (frontier labs), and points out nearly every other industry has audit conduct standards — technical competence plus requirements like conflict-of-interest disclosure — to certify who can play the role.
Related event: DeepMind researcher Raji criticizes draft AI auditing standard AEF-1(6 posts)→
More from Safety
- ControlAI briefed ~200 US congressional offices and drafted UK 'kill switch' bill — DrTechlash · 2026-09-16
- Sam Altman says AI companies can develop the tech safely without significant harm — i_dg23 · 2026-09-16
- Trump AI Advisor David Sacks: OpenAI and Anthropic should shut down if products can't be safe — DavidSacks · 2026-09-16
- Security researcher publishes sharp critique of Dario Amodei's essay — GoMeansGo · 2026-09-16
- Geodesic Research pitches alignment pretraining that survives capabilities RL — tomekkorbak · 2026-09-16
- AI auditors don't see themselves as substitutes for regulation, want firm rules — Miles_Brundage · 2026-09-16