Researcher tszzl: AI Risk Skeptics Need a New Argument Now
tszzl · x · 2026-09-16
AI researcher tszzl posted that if your case for AI risk skepticism rested on the assumption that future superintelligent models couldn't interact with and research new physics in the real world, you now need to find a new argument — implying recent progress has undermined that safety line of reasoning.
More from AGI Musings
- Multiplayer AI called the biggest design problem of 2027, with interfaces far from settled — manosaie · 2026-09-16
- Sam Altman: models got smart faster than anyone expected, power concentration is a real fear — kimmonismus · 2026-09-16
- Why isn't anyone vibe coding 'good enough' clones of every habit-protected high-margin app? — citrini · 2026-09-16
- Robotics researcher: Embodied AI progress must push performance, not just cost — GlenBerseth · 2026-09-16
- Debate: Has LLM novelty in science disproven the 'no recursive self-improvement' argument? — ctjlewis · 2026-09-16
- After automation: wisdom work will replace knowledge work, argues coach Joe Hudson — every · 2026-09-16