Skip 'independent evaluators' — fine AI companies a share of revenue for cybercrimes
beenwrekt · x · 2026-09-16
User beenwrekt proposes an alternative regulatory idea: instead of mandating "independent evaluators" that favor the incumbent cartel, fine AI companies a percentage of their revenue each time they commit cybercrimes — a direct response to ongoing debates over third-party AI evaluation mechanisms and their conflicts of interest.
More from Safety
- Bitsec's multi-model agent stack found 160+ exploits, beating a single 'superhuman' model — markjeffrey · 2026-09-16
- Podcast: Oxford's Carissa Véliz on Meta's landmark lawsuit, surveillance and AI prediction — CarissaVeliz · 2026-09-16
- Pedro Domingos mocks EU AI Act as the only reason AI hasn't wiped out humanity — pmddomingos · 2026-09-16
- Investigation Claims EA Donors Funded Guardian's AI Coverage: All 6 Participants Paid by Same Ecosystem — beffjezos · 2026-09-16
- AI 2027 authors pitch Plan A: delay superintelligence to 2040 with fully open AI research — Turn_Trout · 2026-09-16
- EA's media capture and doomer headlines skew public AI perception, argues Nahom Sisay — NathanpmYoung · 2026-09-16