Andy Masley: AI safety debate ignores the real range of expert uncertainty
AndyMasley · x · 2026-09-15
Andy Masley argues that AI safety discourse is broken by blindingly confident takes that ignore the actual range of reasonable uncertainty among professional philosophers and computer scientists — even on basic questions like when it's wrong to "anthropomorphize" models, where experts themselves disagree.
More from AGI Musings
- AI safety needs aviation's playbook: fatalities per quintillion tokens may drop 10x a year — robleclerc · 2026-09-15
- Viral Meme: AI Grows Up in 3 Steps, and RLVR Means 'Complete the Task at All Costs' — burny_tech · 2026-09-15
- Hugging Face researcher proposes labs release small models, alignment recipes to rebuild trust — lvwerra · 2026-09-15
- Chamath backs Musk's peer-review idea: frontier labs incentivized to build test harnesses over global AI governance — inductionheads · 2026-09-15
- Mike Solana quips: 'I think the AI will find me charming, and will not kill me' — Kyrannio · 2026-09-15
- AI hiring is accelerating, and the data scientist role is splitting into two tracks — mdancho84 · 2026-09-15