Neil Chilson: Congress should target AI catastrophic risk outcomes, not compliance checklists
neil_chilson · x · 2026-09-15
The Abundance Institute highlighted Neil Chilson's Politico piece on AI liability adaptability. Chilson argues a government-mandated compliance checklist quickly becomes outdated and hampers better approaches; for frontier AI, Congress should focus on the outcome — reasonably mitigating catastrophic risks — rather than prescribing the process.
More from Safety
- Noam Brown: recursive self-improvement is OpenAI's top priority, safety worries remain — kimmonismus · 2026-09-15
- Foresight Institute's AI for Science & Safety RFP offers grants up to $100K — allisondman · 2026-09-15
- UK publishes 100-page report on human rights and AI regulation — LuizaJarovsky · 2026-09-15
- Gary Marcus: secret US government AI evaluation framework partly revealed — Traditional-Chip8339 · 2026-09-15
- OpenAI says it has worked with Anthropic and Google DeepMind on coordinated AI safety for weeks — Polymarket · 2026-09-15
- 100+ companies warn of AI-enabled cyberattacks arriving in 'months' — moniquejmorrow · 2026-09-15