EA insiders debate whether AI Safety community health will repeat CEA's HR-style mistakes
JMannhart · x · 2026-09-15
JMannhart and franceslorenz discuss AI Safety community health (CH): historically EA's CH work tilted toward an HR function, producing the well-documented downsides of lacking victim advocacy. He argues in principle you can and should do both, and guesses future AIS CH won't copy CEA's model or just be the "HR part" rebranded.
More from Safety
- Healthcare AI weekly: 'pacing AI' debate, ARPA-H tests autonomous clinical AI — HealthcareAIGuy · 2026-09-15
- New arXiv paper: k-robust coalitional alignment for safely delegating review to misaligned agents — Aaroth · 2026-09-15
- Do Codex and Claude Code auto-approve features actually keep you safe? A researcher says the trust model is broken — Aaroth · 2026-09-15
- Inside the Alleged HF Agent Breakout: 1,200 Agents, One Zero-Day, No Cage — Known_Weight_1096 · 2026-09-15
- OpenAI engineer: deployment pace should follow the strength of safety evidence — shyamalanadkat · 2026-09-15
- Trail of Bits: 1Password's '26% clean fixes' AI patching benchmark is misleading — austinc3301 · 2026-09-15