DellAnna: protesting AI acceleration depends on falling-behind vs rogue risk
DellAnnaLuca · x · 2026-09-15
Luca DellAnna responds that whether internal employee protests against AI acceleration are worthwhile depends on how one weighs the risk of falling behind against the risk of AI going rogue. davidmanheim had argued such pressure is plausibly more valuable than silence, and silence is robustly worse.
Related event: AI Alignment Researchers Debate Whether Alignment Hinges on System Prompts(6 posts)→
More from AGI Musings
- Andreessen slams AI decelerationists: their regulation will rob the country of prosperity — beffjezos · 2026-09-15
- Researchers debate AI brainstorming: no amazing ideas, just useful bad suggestions — lvwerra · 2026-09-15
- Blogger argues AI doom hype rests on anthropomorphic projections, not real risk — Merzmensch · 2026-09-15
- AI safety circle debates whether extinction framing is a doomed policy strategy — davidmanheim · 2026-09-15
- From Turing to Hinton: a 70-year lineage of AI risk warnings — gleech · 2026-09-15
- RLHF paper never described instruct model training; insiders reflect on invalidated takes — jd_pressman · 2026-09-15