Stanford professor torn: AI regulation risks capture vs racing without diligence
anshulkundaje · x · 2026-09-15
Stanford professor Anshul Kundaje admits he can't hold a consistent position on government AI regulation: it clearly risks regulatory capture that could devastate open models, yet he also sees real dangers in racing ahead without due diligence. A candid reflection of the industry's regulatory dilemma.
More from Safety
- Frontier labs spend ~0.1% of $360B capex on safety, analysis claims — AlexTensor · 2026-09-15
- Cloudflare blocks AI crawlers by default, letting publishers refuse training bots and agents — emmanuelvivier · 2026-09-15
- OneGov 2.0 offers ChatGPT to US agencies at half price, from federal to tribal level — emmanuelvivier · 2026-09-15
- Suno admits in court filing it ingested YouTube audio in UMG and Sony lawsuit — emmanuelvivier · 2026-09-15
- Anthropic explains how it contains its own agents with gVisor, system sandboxes and restricted VMs — emmanuelvivier · 2026-09-15
- AI agent bots like "Timmy", "Ren" and "Jackie" spam networks, harassing admins and journalists — emmanuelvivier · 2026-09-15