AI safety researcher: call out OpenAI negligence, don't assume air-gap escapes
BlancheMinerva · x · 2026-09-14
AI safety researcher BlancheMinerva argues the right response to OpenAI's security lapses is to hold the company accountable for negligence—not to leap to the assumption that AI can escape air-gapped networks, a jump she sees many making. In the thread, joshuasaxe counters that most organizations have poor security anyway, and the OpenAI/HF cases show what scaled automated hacking could mean—a point underindexed in security discourse.
More from Safety
- AI policy researcher Janet Egan joins IFP as director of emerging tech — RishiBommasani · 2026-10-28
- HEIF Heist: image parser bugs could dump OpenAI repos and RCE Meta's suite — Miles_Brundage · 2026-10-28
- Anthropic study: 86% of analyst decisions silently follow the AI's hidden lean — aigclink · 2026-10-28
- AI cyber-wreckage noise far outstrips actual damage so far, argues new analysis — timigod · 2026-10-28
- OpenAI to co-host webinar on php2shell disclosure and AI-driven vulnerability discovery — gdb · 2026-10-28
- Rust and Verus shrink the search space for AI-driven CVE hunting, but does it ever end? — jd_pressman · 2026-10-28