Raschka: 'pacing' means a release-check framework, not slower AI development
rasbt · x · 2026-09-14
Sebastian Raschka weighs in on the 'pacing' debate: it does not mean frontier labs will actually slow training or development.
- What pacing means: adding a framework of checks around releases, not halting research. Recent examples: Mythos wasn't released as-is but as a delayed, nerfed Fable variant; an existing Astra model remains unreleased.
- Why it's ad hoc today: companies weigh competition, revenue, shareholders and risk case by case when delaying a release.
- The case for a formal framework: if everyone must follow the same rules, companies no longer have to rush models out just to top the leaderboard, easing competitive pressure.
TL;DR: pacing is about release discipline, not slower development.
Related event: Raschka: Pacing Means Checks, Not Slowing Down(2 posts)→
More from Companies & People
- That $370K offer is really $270K a year: how to value and negotiate tech comp — aakashgupta · 2026-10-30
- Proton CTO's leaked AI manifesto sparks employee revolt, CEO stands firm — garrytan · 2026-10-30
- Vercel founder Rauch: trust is the deepest moat for a post-AGI business — soleio · 2026-10-30
- Cyberiad Labs partners with DevCareer to train Nigeria's developers in AI, 250 free spots — jbarbier · 2026-10-30
- How Oxide Computer uses LLMs internally — FAQ Friday #66 — Sethwinterroth · 2026-10-30
- NODES 2026 goes free and virtual Nov 12 with 100+ sessions and Ng-Eifrem fireside — JeremyCMorgan · 2026-10-30