Reviewer pushes back: average ML papers are also "very meh"
jankulveit · x · 2026-09-14
Replying to the claim that LessWrong posts beat average ML papers, Jsevillamol argues the average LessWrong post is very meh and below academic papers in math and CS. jankulveit, reviewing ML papers regularly, adds that average academic ML papers are also certainly very meh.
Related event: Debate Erupts Over Whether LessWrong Posts Beat ML Papers in Quality(3 posts)→
More from AGI Musings
- AI alignment must account for changing and contested values, argues Dylan Hadfield-Menell — dhadfieldmenell · 2026-09-14
- Boltz-2 run 100 million times: Recursion researcher builds a minimal virtual cell — HannesStaerk · 2026-09-14
- Catalini's 'Simple Economics of AGI': the Measurability Gap and the Hollow Economy risk — naval · 2026-09-14
- Naval amplifies AGI economics paper: verification, not intelligence, is the binding constraint — naval · 2026-09-14
- What If AI Was Owned Collectively? The Building Blocks of Decentralized AI — Admirable_Wasabi_732 · 2026-09-14
- Reasoning models' success makes denying computationalism ever harder — Aaroth · 2026-09-14