Fchollet questions whether frontier labs' AI slowdown calls are a power grab
mjdramstead · x · 2026-09-14
Fchollet asks whether frontier labs' proposals to pace AI research stem from genuine safety concern or a bid to cement market dominance. If genuine, he argues, oversight must take democratic, accountable national and international forms, like the US NRC and IAEA — not a single body staffed by the labs themselves. Quoting his post, mmitchellai contends Dario's concern is sincere but "manifested from" incentives to consolidate power, warning how our jobs shape our beliefs.
More from Safety
- PHP2Shell exploits confirmed in the wild, attackers may use agentic AI for post-exploitation — AravSrinivas · 2026-10-27
- php2shell exploit benchmark: only 2 of 5 frontier models can port the bug — xeophon · 2026-10-27
- Interactive 32-slide AI security & privacy lecture for lawyers, now public — chrisrohlf · 2026-10-27
- Two CVSS 9.9 Wasmtime flaws allow sandbox escape, one ARM64-only since 2020 — basedjensen · 2026-10-27
- Free prepare.aiendgame.com site guides users through locking down accounts amid AI cyberstorm — harris_edouard · 2026-10-27
- Cisco routers trust eMudhra CAs whose private keys were numbers under 256 — murat_kocaoglu_ · 2026-10-27