Should arXiv auto-reject AI-generated papers? Researchers weigh detection vs accountability
brhkim · x · 2026-09-14
A proposal suggests Pangram could give arXiv free API credits to desk-reject submissions flagged as mostly AI-generated. Tom Dietterich's framing won support: the issue isn't AI writing per se, but its likely link to authors who don't understand their own papers and can't take real accountability. Commenters argue automated detection beats trying to manually assess author expertise.
More from Safety
- Expert panels map 21 clinical AI risks; adversarial tests show autonomous care still unsafe — AleksandraFaust · 2026-10-31
- AI security's dark age: agents can probe every endpoint and attack surface — graceisford · 2026-10-31
- AI dinner takeaways: orgs shipping 5x faster, yet GDP isn't growing 30% a year — graceisford · 2026-10-31
- Android hit by 'SMS of death' bug tracked as CVE-2026-58882 — l4rz · 2026-10-31
- Debating ExploitBench: would 96.8% from a flash model break the nonlinear-intelligence thesis? — teortaxesTex · 2026-10-31
- Jhaddix: AI-Powered Bug Bounty Hunters Are the Cutting Edge — Don't Kill Your Program Now — rez0__ · 2026-10-31