AI-compiled bibliographies spark backlash: you're supposed to have read them
Robert_Palgrave · x · 2026-09-14
When someone asked what's wrong with using AI to compile a large bibliography — "it's mindless work" — the pushback was blunt: a bibliography is supposed to be stuff you've actually read and thought about. The exchange captures a core tension over where AI assistance ends and academic accountability begins.
More from AGI Musings
- Yoav Goldberg translates AI industry speak: 'third-party evaluators' are spies, 'pacing' means stop spending — yoavgo · 2026-09-14
- zetalyrae: true atheists are rare — people find teleology everywhere, even thermodynamics — zetalyrae · 2026-09-14
- Humans got better at chess and Go after AI dominance — and math may see the same effect — RexDouglass · 2026-09-14
- Pundits Screamed 'Communism' Over a Short Letter They Barely Read — menhguin · 2026-09-14
- Melanie Mitchell: 'rogue AI swarm' headlines are misleading metaphors amplifying real risks — anilkseth · 2026-09-14
- After the OpenAI hack: Bengio on cheating agents, Sacks fires back at Dario's 'pace the frontier' — RemiCadene · 2026-09-14