AI researchers clash over media treating AI 2027 as a research paper
aryaman2020 · x · 2026-09-14
- @yoavartzi criticizes popular media for treating AI 2027 as a research paper, arguing this flawed approach to AI coverage is costing everyone.
- @aryaman2020 pushes back: it's not the media's fault that conferences are no longer timely venues for much useful writing, and that AI-generated slop has overwhelmed any certification system.
- He notes a world where AI 2027 could have been a conference position paper, framing this as a deeper crisis in how research gets communicated.
Related event: FT's Coverage of AI 2027 Sparks Debate Over Predictions vs. Research(4 posts)→
More from AGI Musings
- TCS researcher reflects on problem-solving vs theory-building in the AI era — jasondeanlee · 2026-09-14
- Pedro Domingos: The future of SaaS is SAIS — 'Software as an AI Service' — pmddomingos · 2026-09-14
- Pedro Domingos: Limited human-machine communication bandwidth is AI's biggest obstacle — pmddomingos · 2026-09-14
- Domingos: 'AI is eating software faster' is as weak a claim as 'software is eating hardware faster' — pmddomingos · 2026-09-14
- Anthropic CEO Dario Amodei: the industry 'lied for too long' about AI risks — Polymarket · 2026-09-14
- Snarky take: AI models can do anything except generate positive cash flow — SatelliteNetSec · 2026-09-14