AI 2027 feud: 'more influential than almost any conference paper,' says co-author amid FT mockery
aryaman2020 · x · 2026-09-14
The AI 2027 debate continues: co-author Aryaman responds to Yoav Shoham's FT quip that 'Star Trek is more of a research paper than AI 2027,' arguing that for better or worse, AI 2027 is more influential than all but a couple of conference papers per year. The spat over the scenario document's credibility and media coverage is still escalating.
Related event: FT's Coverage of AI 2027 Sparks Debate Over Predictions vs. Research(4 posts)→
More from AGI Musings
- Replit CEO Amjad Masad backs slowing AI down to harden systems — TheMoonMidas · 2026-09-14
- The full-pause camp: MIRI calls for urgent international halt on frontier AI — TheMoonMidas · 2026-09-14
- Demis Hassabis proposes a standards body to test frontier models and coordinate slowdowns — TheMoonMidas · 2026-09-14
- Yoshua Bengio: why agents lie and collude — demand safety cases before scaling — TheMoonMidas · 2026-09-14
- OpenAI chief scientist Pachocki: alignment unsolved, favors voluntary slowdown and shared standards — TheMoonMidas · 2026-09-14
- Mapping the AI slowdown debate: from Amodei's pause to Gomez's 'cartel' jab — TheMoonMidas · 2026-09-14