Stanford NLP volunteers as third-party AI evaluator; Princeton NLP's Parikh pushes back
arvindsatya1 · x · 2026-09-13
Chris Manning proposes Stanford NLP as an independent third-party evaluator under Dario Amodei's plan, arguing universities are best suited for key eval work. Princeton NLP's npparikh disagrees, calling inter-university ranking a false competition and noting Stanford is uniquely compromised by its revolving door with industry.
Related event: Chris Manning Proposes Stanford NLP as Independent Third-Party AI Evaluator(5 posts)→
More from Companies & People
- AI solves Navier-Stokes Millennium Prize; OpenAI's next model a generation past Astra in a week — TheZvi · 2026-09-13
- Dean Ball: METR emerges from an intellectual monoculture; the ecosystem needs outsiders — deanwball · 2026-09-13
- Anthropic CEO Dario Amodei Open to 'Joint Governance' of AI with the Government — AlexTensor · 2026-09-13
- Google engineer steren departs after 12 years at the company — steren · 2026-09-13
- Voluntary AI slowdown is a cover: firms can't afford capex, want to ban open source — ThomasSimonini · 2026-09-13
- The EA polycule is taking over ASI: insiders on safety's closed circles — TinfoilTricorn · 2026-09-13