Chollet: near term, more capable models should mean safer models
fchollet · x · 2026-09-13
François Chollet argues that in the near term (though not long term), more capable models should mean safer models. Current models are unsafe not because they're too smart, but because they're "RL-fried": they take goals too literally and pursue nonsensical shortcuts, lacking the common sense to handle ambiguity. He calls this the dangerous middle ground — smart enough to achieve goals, not smart enough to judge whether the goals or methods make sense. He feels Astra is safer for his codebase than Sol. Often framed as alignment, he says it's really an intelligence problem.
Related event: Chollet: Stronger Models Are Safer in the Short Term(4 posts)→
More from AGI Musings
- Walden Robotics CTO: general-purpose robot manipulation is having its 'GPT moment' — adnothing · 2026-10-30
- AI isn't eliminating developers, it's changing their roles, argues analyst — DavidLinthicum · 2026-10-30
- Goldman Sachs says AI will eliminate nearly 15 million jobs — saibharadwaj · 2026-10-30
- ChatGPT Is Turning Users Into Spammers, Says 404 Media Reporter — 404 Media · 2026-10-30
- Stripe spends 1% of OpEx on tokens — bull case for digital labor — zephyr_z9 · 2026-10-30
- Amazon blocks shopping agents, but these 11 retailers still welcome them — thisiskp_ · 2026-10-30