AI scientist's six-point responsibility manifesto: against weaponization and pre-IPO hype
NandoDF · x · 2026-09-13
An AI researcher lays out six points of responsible AI practice: design seriously for global safety, make safe AI accessible and favour decentralised AI over concentration of power in a few hands, seek international agreements on defence uses while opposing AI weaponisation, incentivise AI for science/health/clean energy (citing @periodiclabs and @IsomorphicLabs), refuse to use AI-risk hype as pre-IPO marketing — "we scientists see it" — and read Terence Tao on building AI tools that enhance mathematical understanding.
More from AGI Musings
- Open source AI will split into open vs "safe" open, says Hugging Face and OpenRouter will get nerfed — DevDminGod · 2026-09-13
- Developer grills OpenAI: has AGI been declared, and where is the expert panel? — tomchapin · 2026-09-13
- Open AI governance debate: only power concentration benefits a concentrated few — yacineMTB · 2026-09-13
- Distillation means a frontier pause still pushes Astra-grade models to $0.3/1M tokens — teortaxesTex · 2026-09-13
- Superintelligence debate misses the point: power, incentives and guardrails matter more — TansuYegen · 2026-09-13
- AI cold outreach flood: professor gets 75 PhD inquiries months before 2027 cycle — random_walker · 2026-09-13