Banks face an AI skills gap: why would AI talent opt into third-party evaluation roles?
neal_lathia · x · 2026-09-13
A recurring complaint in banking: a skills gap emerges because if you're great at working with AI, why opt into a career as a third-party evaluator instead of building the tech yourself?
In the three lines of defense model, the author notes it's not just about having someone else evaluate — it's also about assessing whether those in the lines ahead are evaluating correctly, i.e., everyone manages risk.
Related event: Banking Risk Veteran: AI Risk Is About Acceptability, Not p(doom)(3 posts)→
More from Companies & People
- Bindu Reddy mocks Google: it trails even open source, nowhere near the frontier — bindureddy · 2026-09-13
- AI Book Club reads Nathan Lambert's RLHF book, author Q&A on Sep 24 — natolambert · 2026-09-13
- Stanford tuition runs $260K, but 2,100+ free courses put its full AI curriculum online for anyone — Aiden_Tech_Ai · 2026-09-13
- Investor Jeff Weinstein wants to back agent-first hardware and new OSes — jeff_weinstein · 2026-09-13
- OpenAI hosts GPT-6 Astra hackathon; attendees say GPT-Live-1 blew their minds — gabrielchua · 2026-09-13
- NYT's front page full of AI regulation calls as firms rush to ditch frontier models — OvertaxedOne · 2026-09-13